Kids Holdings, Inc. v. Hinojosa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that credibility could be evaluated favorably when the applicant’s testimony was based on what she learned as a child since there is a distinct difference between provid- ing such a description and reciting a fabricated story
• stating that relevant factors include experiences which adversely affect personal, religious or gender-based identity and not entirely physical harm
• Board’s assessment of asylum eligibility, based even partially on administrative notice of a post-hearing change in government, requires opportunity to rebut any disputable noticed facts
• “In the circumstances of this case, where the BIA noticed facts and made disputable inferences based on those facts which ... were dispositive of [petitioners’ appeal, we hold that due process requires the BIA to give [petitioners advance notice and an opportunity to be heard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).