Kiddoo Bros. v. Ames & Robins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence that was admissible under res gestae was \circumstantially intimately connected and explanatory of the crime\
• holding Biggers did not apply to an identification because the \testimony related to seeing [the defendant] a year before the [crime] and was for the purpose of showing that [the defendant] knew [the victim]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).