Skip to main content
· 12/24/1991

Kidd v. Pritzel

Citations

  • 821 S.W.2d 566
  • 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1906
  • 1991 WL 273932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that purpose of 5 U.S.C. § 8705 is \to provide for the speedy and economical settlement of claims\
  • examining legislative history and the subsequent amendments to the statute and concluding purpose of section 8705 is to provide a quick and economic settlement of insurance claims
  • detailing the legislative history of 5 U.S.C. § 8705 and cited by the majority
  • “[t]he omission of an anti-attachment clause supports a conclusion that nothing in FEGLIA dictates pre-emption of equitable state law principles.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lowenstein, Fenner, Hanna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.