Kidd v. Norman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude the district court correctly interpreted Amrine as requiring [petitioner] . . . to come forward with new reliable evidence which was not available at trial through the exercise of due diligence.”
• noting the connection between marijuana and feeling hungry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).