Kidd v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Evidence that a driver’s speech was slurred, that his blood-shot eyes did not react to light, and that he could not perform the simple physical tasks involved in a field sobriety test sufficed to establish that his ability to drive was impaired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thedford v. Administrative Director of the Courts
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-07-17
• Sarah Parr v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-08-01

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Hayden v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1989-03-31· cited 11×
• Bridges v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1993-01-21· cited 5×