· 2/22/2007
Kidd International Home Care, Inc. v. Prince
Citations
- 917 A.2d 1083
- 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 81
- 2007 WL 527443
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the common law mailbox rule “creates a rebut-table presumption that a letter properly addressed, stamped, and mailed, and not returned to the sender, has been delivered to the addressee.”
- addressing claimant’s failure to participate when a similar jurisdictional issue was raised, and discussing D.C.App. R. 81(c)
- “[W]hile the rules of this court require briefs to be filed by the parties, if a party fails to file a brief, the court may nonetheless choose to move ahead with the case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reid, Fisher, Schwelb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.