Skip to main content
· 2/22/2007

Kidd International Home Care, Inc. v. Prince

Citations

  • 917 A.2d 1083
  • 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 81
  • 2007 WL 527443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the common law mailbox rule “creates a rebut-table presumption that a letter properly addressed, stamped, and mailed, and not returned to the sender, has been delivered to the addressee.”
  • addressing claimant’s failure to participate when a similar jurisdictional issue was raised, and discussing D.C.App. R. 81(c)
  • “[W]hile the rules of this court require briefs to be filed by the parties, if a party fails to file a brief, the court may nonetheless choose to move ahead with the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reid, Fisher, Schwelb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.