KIANTE AHMAD JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that defendant’s failure to object to closure did not constitute waiver of right to public trial
• finding that by conducting individual questioning of prospective jurors “the trial judge closed the courtroom”
• noting that “Momah is correct in terms of the ability to raise the issue,” though “being able to raise an issue on appeal does not automatically mean reversal is required”
• noting that a portion of voir dire occurred in chambers and discussing that procedure as a closure
• concluding defendant invited error when he did not object because the court “carefully considered” the defendant’s rights on the record when balancing defendant’s right to an impartial jury
• concluding defendant invited error when he did not object because the court “carefully considered” the defendant’s rights on the record when balancing defendant’s right to an impartial jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).