Khattak v. Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the Full Faith and Credit Act, a federal court must give the same preclusive effect to a state court judgment as another court of that state would give
• holding that under the Full Faith and Credit Act, a federal court must give the same preclusive effect to a state court judgment as another court of that state would give
• holding that federal courts give state-court judgments the same preclusive effect as would be given the law of the State
• holding that a federal court must apply state preclusion law to determine whether a present claim is res judicata
• concluding that the \preclusive effect in federal court of [the plaintiff's] state-court judgment is determined by [state] law\
• holding that a § 1983 claim not raised in state court was precluded from being raised in subsequent federal case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).