Khasawneh v. Aldamen
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 937
Syllabus
Because appellant did not make hearing transcript necessary for resolution of his assigned error part of the appellate record as required by App.R. 9, did not file objections to the magistrate's factual findings or legal conclusions as required by Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b), and did not argue on appeal that the domestic relations court committed plain error when it granted wife's motion for contempt for failure to pay child support, we must presume regularity of the proceedings below and validity of the trial court's judgment without reaching the merits of appellant's sole assignment of error. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the inception of the “two-prong test for evaluating whether a search of a student is constitutional.”
- “[NJothing in the School Code allows us to infer that a disciplinary dean has been delegated policymaking authority.” (reviewing 105 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/10-21.4a, the section of the Illinois School Code concerning duties of principals and assistant principals)
- requiring “a pattern or a series of incidents of unconstitutional conduct”
- requiring “a pattern or a series of incidents of unconstitutional conduct”
- requiring “a pattern or a series of incidents of unconstitutional conduct”
- “[A]s the intrusiveness of the search of a student intensifies, so too does the standard of Fourth Amendment reasonableness.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edelstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.