· 1/28/2008
Khan v. United States ex rel. Internal Revenue Service
Citations
- 537 F. Supp. 2d 944
- 101 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 729
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a plaintiff could not 16 recover the cost of her medical bills from an insurer under the CPA
- explaining the type of injuries considered to be to business or property under the CPA
- denying summary judgment on 4 bad faith claim where it was unclear whether the insurer “properly considered all medical evidence 5 in the case.”
- “If [the plaintiff] can establish that 5 she incurred damages as result of the automobile accident and those damages are covered by her 6 UIM policy but remain unpaid in bad faith, then [she] is entitled to recover those damages.”
- “As [the plaintiff] has not yet quantified her 14 damages, the court will not issue an advisory opinion as to whether [her] injuries in this case 15 constitute injury under the CPA. The court encourages the parties to address the issue in their trial 16 briefing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.