Skip to main content
· 1/28/2008

Khan v. United States ex rel. Internal Revenue Service

Citations

  • 537 F. Supp. 2d 944
  • 101 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 729
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff could not 16 recover the cost of her medical bills from an insurer under the CPA
  • explaining the type of injuries considered to be to business or property under the CPA
  • denying summary judgment on 4 bad faith claim where it was unclear whether the insurer “properly considered all medical evidence 5 in the case.”
  • “If [the plaintiff] can establish that 5 she incurred damages as result of the automobile accident and those damages are covered by her 6 UIM policy but remain unpaid in bad faith, then [she] is entitled to recover those damages.”
  • “As [the plaintiff] has not yet quantified her 14 damages, the court will not issue an advisory opinion as to whether [her] injuries in this case 15 constitute injury under the CPA. The court encourages the parties to address the issue in their trial 16 briefing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.