Skip to main content
· 2/27/2009

Khalili v. Holder

Citations

  • 557 F.3d 429
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 4023
  • 2009 WL 483241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Court could review Khalili’s unexhausted argument where “the BIA sua sponte raised and ruled on the merits of Khalili’s claim”
  • holding that the Sixth Circuit has jurisdiction over claims that were not properly raised to the BIA, but where the BIA nonetheless reached their merits
  • noting that, when the BIA issues a separate written decision, this court only reviews an IJ’s opinion to the extent the BIA has adopted it
  • relying on the fact that \police have placed potential victims in protective custody\ to hold that the Jordanian government was not unwilling or unable to protect petitioner
  • relying on the State Department's 2005 Country Report on Human Rights Practices for Jordan to determine how honor crimes were prosecuted and handled on a country-wide basis
  • defining persecution as the infliction of harm to overcome a characteristic of the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Cole, Gilman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.