Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In Re Khaligh)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• having concluded that issue preclusion was permissible, “the question becomes whether the court's actual choice to do so nevertheless was an abuse of discretion.”
• “The arbitrator found that Khaligh’s false and defamatory statements were made with the intent to harm Hadaegh.”
• “[T]he proponent bears the risk of nonpersuasion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).