Khalid v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The benefits of automatic conversion and priority date retention are explicitly conditioned on a particular outcome from the formula in (h)(1)....”
• “The benefits of automatic conversion and priority date retention are explicitly conditioned on a particular out- come from the formula in (h)(1) . . . .”
• “In sum, the better view [of the statute] is the simpler one.”
• the CSPA “as a whole, clearly expresses Congress’ intention about the universe of petitions covered by (h)(3),” and “there is no room for the agency to impose its own answer to the question” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• the CSPA “as a whole, clearly expresses Congress’ intention about the universe of petitions covered by (h)(3),” and “there is no room for the agency to impose its own answer to the question” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).