Khaimraj Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that review was limited to formal categorical approach where the statute of conviction was not disjunctive in a meaningful way
• holding that “sexual abuse of a minor” in the INA does not invite further inquiry
• holding that “sexual abuse of a minor” in the INA does not invite further inquiry
• holding that review was limited to formal categorical approach where the statute of conviction was not disjunctive in a meaningful way
• noting that in cases involving disjunctive statutes of conviction “we have not taken the further step of looking to facts outside the charging instrument or further plea”
• noting that Taylor’s element, the ‘conviction’ will not fit within the enhanced category.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).