Khaim Khaimov v. David Crist, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no certificate of appealability shall issue after denial of a section 2254 petition “if the claim is clearly procedurally defaulted . . . [or] if there is no merit to the substantive constitutional claims”
• rejecting as a matter of law a prisoner’s Sixth Amendment claim based on his public defender’s state funding
• “[C]ircumscribing, and even revoking, a certificate [of appealability], especially one we have issued, is . . . well within our authority”
• “[R]evoking[] a certificate [of appealability], especially one we have issued, is . . . well within our authority.”
• “[C]ircumscribing, and even revoking, a certificate [of appealability], especially one we have issued, is . . . well within our authority”
• “[R]evoking[] a certificate [of appealability], especially one we have issued, is . . . well within our authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).