Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ERISA does not preempt a prevailing wage statute that operates identically to California's current \two-tier\ approach
• holding that ERISA does not preempt a prevailing wage statute that operates identically to California’s current “two-tier” approach
• noting that allowing preemption under similar circumstances would create “disincentive” against awarding benefits
• requiring employers to record benefits contributions will not influence decisions about the structure of ERISA plans and so will not impede the administration of nationwide plans
• requiring employers to record benefits contributions will not influence decisions about the structure of ERISA plans and so will not impede the administration of nationwide plans
• declining to decide the “novel'' question of whether the market participant exception applies to ERISA preemption because the state was not acting as a market participant in any event

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).