Keystone Camera Products Corp. v. Ansco Photo-Optical Products Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff alleging a trade dress violation “must prove initially that it has a protect-able trade dress, in that its trade dress is distinctive or has acquired secondary meaning.”
• identifying the significant weakness in the plaintiffs trade dress claim as being that the Le Clic “look” was “nothing more than a reflection of the fashion trends taking place generally in the marketplace of youthful consumers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).