Keys v. Powell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “Mall has not established that CSX has a duty” and setting out other evidentiary lacunae
• stating that an action to compel a railroad to install a drainage pipe was not preempted in the absence of evidence that it would interfere with railroad operations
• stating in dicta that an action to compel a railroad to install a drainage pipe was not preempted in the absence of evidence that it would interfere with railroad operations, while ruling for the railroad on other grounds
• stating in dicta that an action to compel a railroad to install a drainage pipe was not preempted in the absence of evidence that it would interfere with railroad operations, while ruling for the railroad on other grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).