Key v. Hein, Ebert & Weir, Chtd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding failure to comply with Rule 141 was harmless error
• finding argument that failure to identify the final judgment challenged on appeal and exclusion of catch-all phrasing persuasively established the notice of appeal did not confer appellate jurisdiction
• pro se appeal from “each and every order entered contrary to plaintiff’ adequate to preserve challenge to summary judgment order not specifically referenced
• Kansas Supreme Court liberally construed a notice of appeal to include issues related to an omitted ruling because the order identified by the pro se litigant included references to that ruling, the litigant utilized catchall language, and the appellees were not prejudiced.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).