· 2/7/1985
Key v. Gillette Co.
Citations
- 104 F.R.D. 139
- 37 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,265
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22769
- 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1621
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “If it is determined that the doctor has questioned the plaintiff improperly, that evidence may be excluded at trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caffrey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.