Skip to main content
· 6/19/2017

Key v. Davis

Citations

  • 137 S. Ct. 2272
  • 198 L. Ed. 2d 706
  • 85 U.S.L.W. 3587
  • 2017 WL 1386081
  • 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a pro se plaintiff must also “still comply with the relevant rules of procedural and substantive law”
  • agreeing with District Court’s decision to deny plaintiff leave to amend complaint because an amendment could not save complaint from dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
  • affirming dismissal of pro se litigant’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
  • “[Plaintiff's] complaint arises out of a landlord-tenant dispute over which the federal courts simply have no jurisdiction.”
  • “[Plaintiff’s] complaint arises out of a landlord-tenant dispute over which the federal courts simply have no jurisdiction.”
  • “[Plaintiff’s] complaint arises out of a landlord-tenant dispute over which the federal courts simply have no jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.