Key Risk Ins. Co. v. Peck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where a case is not brought by the real party in interest, it is within the discretion of the trial court to allow a motion to substitute under Rule 17(a)” (citation omitted)
• “Where a case is not brought by the real party in interest, it is within the discretion of the trial court to allow a motion to substitute under Rule 17(a)” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• K2 Asia Ventures v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-09-01
• Dominguez v. Francisco Dominguez Masonry
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-07-05
• Mar. Advisors, LLC v. HC Composites, LLC
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-10-15

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Slaughter v. Swicegood
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2004-02-03· cited 61×
• Dion v. Batten
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-08-02· cited 8×