Key Bank of Alaska v. Donnels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was an abuse of discretion to award attorney fees under NRS 18.010(2)(b
• holding that “[b]ecause respondents did not recover a money judgment below,” they cannot recover attorney fees under NRS 18.010(2)(a)
• concluding that it was an abuse of discretion to award attorney fees under NRS 18.010(2)(b), when the relevant law “was not free from doubt” and the complaint “presented complex legal questions concerning statutory interpretation and legislative intent, raised on reasonable grounds”
• considering whether Alaska's antideficiency statute applied to a Nevada deficiency action where Alaska law otherwise governed the lawsuit
• considering whether Alaska's antideficiency statute applied to a Nevada deficiency action where Alaska law otherwise governed the lawsuit
• “[B]ecause respondents did not recover a money judgment below,” they could not recover attorney fees under NRS 18.010(2)(a).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).