· 6/9/1995
Kevin Tindle v. Lou Caudell, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Little Rock City of Little Rock, Arkansas
Citations
- 56 F.3d 966
- 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1227
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14261
- 1995 WL 341529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Amusing other guests at a private party with no showing of any intended message is not speech on a matter of public concern”
- police officer suspended for attending Fraternal Order of Police party wearing blackened face, bib overalls, black curly wig and carrying watermelon
- \[a] showing of actual disruption is not always required in the balancing process under Pickering \
- “A showing of actual disruption is not always required in the balancing process under Pickering.”
- “There was the potential for more direct consequences to the department than if [she] had attended a family or neighborhood party . . .”
- \[a] showing of actual disruption is not always required in the balancing process under Pickering \
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.