Kevin Taylor v. Jerry D. Gilmore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a murder verdict reached by a jury that had not been instructed to consider the defendant’s manslaughter defenses violated due process
• recognizing that Falconer, Rose and Fleming found the instructions were \inherently prejudicial\
• recognizing that Falconer, Rose and Fleming found the instructions were \inherently prejudicial\
• recognizing that Falconer, Rose and Fleming found the instructions were “inherently prejudicial”
• recognizing that Falconer, Rose and Fleming found the instructions were “inherently prejudicial”
• holding that \Falconer is not a new rule\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).