Kevin T. Donnellan v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Board did not ensure substantial compliance with a prior remand order where the examiner failed to answer a specific question regarding aggravation posed by the Board
• \following the well-established rule of statutory construction that terms in a statute have the same meaning to identical language used in related parts of the same statutory scheme\
• noting the \well-established rule of statutory construction that terms in a statute have the same meaning to identical language used in related parts of the same statutory scheme\
• “[W]here a claim is based on a period of [ACDU-TRA], the presumption of aggravation is not applicable.”
• explaining the difference between the standards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).