Kevin Sterk v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the movant may prevail on summary judgment by demonstrating “an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party’s case”
• holding that the ordinary course of business exception applies to a defendant outsourcing its customer service support to a third party because customer service is a function of business operations normally performed by a company itself
• finding that disclosure of video viewing history was a concrete injury for Article III’s purposes
• noting that district courts are not required to sift record for evidence helpful to opponent of motion for summary judgment
• holding that where the movant meets its “burden” of “showing ... that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving party’s case,” the non-mov-ant “must make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case”
• noting that once a moving party has made a showing “that there is an absence of evidence to support the non-moving party’s case[,] ... the non-movant ... must demonstrate that there is evidence upon which a jury could properly proceed to find a verdict in [its] favor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).