Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether a 24 website reasonably communicated the existence of the terms is a fact-intensive inquiry that 25 “depends on the design and content of the website and the agreement’s webpage.”
• “[T]he conspicuousness and placement of the ‘Terms of Use’ hyperlink, other notices given to users of the terms of use, and the website’s general design all contribute to whether a reasonably prudent user would have inquiry notice of a browsewrap agreement.”
• discussing “clickwrap” and “browsewrap” agreements online

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).