Kevin Murray v. Charles Greiner, Superintendent, Julio Cesar Arce v. Brian Fischer, Superintendent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal for failure to comply 21 with one-year statute of limitations renders subsequent petitions challenging the same conviction 22 or sentence “second or successive” under § 2244(b)
• holding that dismissal of a § 2254 petition as untimely “constitutes an adjudication on the merits that renders future petitions under § 2254 challenging the same conviction ‘second or successive’ under § 2244(b)”
• holding that dismissal of a § 2254 petition as untimely “constitutes an adjudication on the merits that renders future petitions under § 2254 challenging the same conviction ‘second or successive’ under § 2244(b)”
• holding that “dismissal of a § 2254 petition for failure to comply with the one-year statute of limitations constitutes an adjudication on the merits that renders future petitions under § 2254 challenging the same conviction ‘second or successive’ petitions”
• holding that “dismissal of a § 2254 petition for failure to comply with the one- year statute of limitations constitutes an adjudication on the merits that renders future petitions under § 2254 challenging the same conviction ‘second or successive’ petitions”
• holding that a “dismissal of a § 2254 petition for failure to comply with the one-year statute of limitations constitutes an adjudication on the merits that renders future petitions under § 2254 challenging the same conviction ‘second or successive’ petitions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).