· 4/5/1999
Kevin McHale v. United States
Citations
- 175 F.3d 115
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6062
- 1999 WL 223435
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[R]equiring a pro se litigant on a section 2255 motion to demonstrate 18 the merit of a hypothetical appeal would undermine the right to counsel enjoyed by every criminal defendant on direct appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Jacobs, Tsoucalas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.