Skip to main content
· 4/5/1999

Kevin McHale v. United States

Citations

  • 175 F.3d 115
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6062
  • 1999 WL 223435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[R]equiring a pro se litigant on a section 2255 motion to demonstrate 18 the merit of a hypothetical appeal would undermine the right to counsel enjoyed by every criminal defendant on direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Jacobs, Tsoucalas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.