Kevin Lamar Adams Bobbie Adams v. City of Auburn Hills, a Municipal Corporation, John Backstrom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting excessive force claim because shooting at car’s tires was not seizure
• “[S]hooting at a fleeing felon, but missing, is not a ‘seizure.’”
• “Á district court’s decision rejecting an individual defendant’s claim to qualified immunity is immediately appealable to the extent that it raises a question of law, notwithstanding the absence of a final judgment.’’
• “Without an underlying constitutional violation, the question of whether [Defendant] is entitled to qualified immunity is moot.”
• “A district court’s decision rejecting an individual defendant’s claim to qualified immunity is immediately appealable to the extent that it raises a question of law, notwithstanding the absence of a final judgment.”
• “Because the Fourth Amendment is not implicated, Adams has not alleged a constitutional violation to support a § 1983 claim. Without an underlying constitutional violation, the question of whether Backstrom is entitled to qualified immunity is moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).