Kevin J. Mamon v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, absent a claim of fabricated evidence or willful malfeasance on the part of the police and no showing that the evidence is not what it appears to be, the claimed error in admission is not fundamental
• rejecting the defendant’s claim of fundamental error where the defendant made no assertion of evidence fabrication or willful malfeasance
• rejecting claim of fundamental error where defendant argued officer misunderstood the traffic law that formed the basis for a stop but did not dispute the truth of the officer’s testimony or exhibits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).