· 4/18/2024
Kevin Eugene Jackson, Jr. v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Upholding conviction even though “[t]here is no way to know what really happened between the witness and the interpreter, nor determine the adequacy of the translation.”
- affirming denial of motion to suppress where defendant relied on government’s argument at bail hearing that he resided at searched property and failed to present any evidence supporting his standing
- considering errors in interpretation “within the context of the entire trial”
- “occasional lapses in [word for word interpretation] will not necessarily contravene a defendant’s constitutional rights”
- no error where law clerk read the jury’s question into the record and discussed alternative Allen charges with counsel while waiting for the judge to arrive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.