Kevin Davis v. Wayne County Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in deciding on a facial constitutional challenge, it is improper to consider only limited hypothetical applications
• holding that in deciding on a facial constitutional challenge, it is improper to consider only limited hypothetical applications
• holding as an improper subsidy the use of public funds to help construct buildings for religious colleges, where the government prohibits religious use of those buildings for only 20 years
• noting that entanglement concerns are lessened where there is less risk that \government aid will in fact serve to support religious activities\
• noting that, although statute in question passed muster on its face, “[ijndividual projects can be properly evaluated if and when challenges arise with respect to particular recipients.... ”
• recognizing that \college students are less impressionable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).