· 12/21/2001
Kevin Cooper v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Citations
- 274 F.3d 1270
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10542
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 13149
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26993
- 2001 WL 1636503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] district court may not, in the absence of proper authorization from the court of appeals, consider a second or successive habeas application.”
- “When the AEDPA is in play, the district court may not, in the absence of proper authorization from the court of appeals, consider a second or successive habeas application.” (citation omitted)
- “‘When the AEDPA is in 16 play, the district court may not, in the absence of proper authorization from the court of appeals, 17 consider a second or successive habeas application.’”
- “When the AEDPA is in play, the district 18 court may not, in the absence of proper authorization from the court of appeals, consider 19 a second or successive habeas application.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Rymer, Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.