Skip to main content
· 12/21/2001

Kevin Cooper v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin

Citations

  • 274 F.3d 1270
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10542
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 13149
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26993
  • 2001 WL 1636503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] district court may not, in the absence of proper authorization from the court of appeals, consider a second or successive habeas application.”
  • “When the AEDPA is in play, the district court may not, in the absence of proper authorization from the court of appeals, consider a second or successive habeas application.” (citation omitted)
  • “‘When the AEDPA is in 16 play, the district court may not, in the absence of proper authorization from the court of appeals, 17 consider a second or successive habeas application.’”
  • “When the AEDPA is in play, the district 18 court may not, in the absence of proper authorization from the court of appeals, consider 19 a second or successive habeas application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Rymer, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.