Kevin C. Carter v. Tennant Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding termination legitimate and non- because of his disability rather than his dishonesty. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 617–18 (4th Cir. 2020
• finding argument waived when made for the first time in reply brief
• finding argument waived when made for the first time in reply brief
• finding argument waived when made for the first time in reply brief
• \The Second Circuit's Wolde-Meskel opinion explains thoroughly why aggregated claims of a single plaintiff do not fit the supplemental jurisdiction model.\
• “Under either standard, [the employee] loses if [the employer] can provide a valid, non-pretextual reason for its decision to terminate [him].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).