Skip to main content
· 3/3/1999

Kevin B. Paige v. United States

Citations

  • 171 F.3d 559
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3366
  • 1999 WL 147982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that equitable tolling is not 8 available to prisoner whose petition, prepared by an inmate in a different institution, was delayed in the mail
  • “No affirmative misconduct on the prison’s part lulled [the petitioner] into in- action.”
  • finding a mail delay between prisons not an extraordinary circumstance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Fagg, Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.