Kev, Inc. v. Kitsap County and the Honorable Ray Aardal and John Horsley, County Commissioners of Kitsap, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ordinance prohibiting dancers from “caressing” and “fondling” patrons was not vague “in the context of the other definitions provided in the ordinance” at issue
• concluding that municipal ordinance requiring licensure of \erotic dancers and erotic dance studios\ served valid governmental purpose because it allowed municipality to \allocate law enforcement resources to ensure compliance with the ordinance\
• concluding that municipal ordinance requiring licensure of “erotic dancers and erotic dance studios” served valid governmental purpose because it allowed municipality to “allocate law enforcement resources to ensure compliance with the ordinance”
• finding that the delay in issuing an operator’s license gave the police department time to allocate resources to ensure compliance with the city ordinance
• interpreting Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., 427 U.S. 50, 96 S. Ct. 2440, 49 L. Ed. 2d 310, reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 873 (1976)
• upholding a regulation requiring that all dancing in erotic dance studios take place at least 10 feet from patrons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).