Keusch v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding mandatory joinder not required when juvenile charged with fourth degree assault in one case and taking a motor vehicle without permission in another case
• holding mandatory joinder not required when juvenile charged with fourth degree assault in one case and taking a motor vehicle without permission in another case
• “provid[ing] juvenile offenders with an opportunity 2 As mentioned in Section I, supra, juveniles are ineligible if they have committed sex or violent offenses. RCW 13.40.127(1)(a
• The courts “are not ‘obliged to discern any ambiguity by imagining a variety of alternative interpretations.’ ” (internal quotation marks omitted
• when a statute is ambiguous, the court will resort to principles of statutory construction to determine legislative intent
• \Legislative definitions included in the statute are controlling.\(citing State V. Sullivan, 143 Wn.2d 162, 175, 19 P.3d 1012(2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).