Skip to main content
· 8/21/2009

Ketchup v. Driver

Citations

  • 341 F. App'x 869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a bankruptey court's decision on its own order to show cause—over a debtor's objection-—-botA to abstain under section 305 and to dismiss a case for cause under section 1112 of the Bankruptcy Code, because the case was a two-party dispute
  • Unlike § 305(a), which permits dismissal of all proceeding within the case, section 1334(c) “provides for abstention from particular proceedings.”
  • “A bankruptcy court’s decision to dismiss a case under § 1112(b) is [ ] a final order subject to review by the Panel.”
  • cause to dismiss exists where there is a lack of true bankruptcy purpose in a case involving a two-party dispute between a single creditor and a debtor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agee, Hamilton, Michael

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.