Skip to main content
· 7/1/1866

Ketchum v. Crippen

Citations

  • 31 Cal. 365

Syllabus

<p>Transcript: on Appeal.—If a case is on the calendar, and submitted for decision on briefs to be filed in vacation, it will require a strong showing to justify this Court, on motion made at the next term, in permitting additions to the transcript to he made of matters before deliberately omitted by the moving party.</p> <p>Appealable Order.—An order refusing to strike out a statement made on motion for a new trial is not an appealable order. It is not “ a special order made after final judgment ” within the meaning of sections three hundred and thirty-six and three hundred and forty-seven of the Practice Act.</p> <p>Order to strike out is Interlocutory.—An order striking out or refusing to strike out statement on motion for new trial, is interlocutory to the order granting or refusing to grant a new trial, which is the final and appealable order.</p>

Judges: Sawyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.