Ketchum v. City of Vallejo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs’ FLSA collective action is time-barred unless the plaintiffs can demonstrate that the three-year statutory period applies because no consent by any plaintiff, including the named plaintiffs, had been filed within the two-year statutory period
• finding time spent picking up horses prior to events requiring the horses was compensable
• plaintiffs sufficiently alleged willfulness to defeat summary judgment motion, where plaintiffs repeatedly complained of uncompensated work hours
• “When 11 a ‘collective action’ is filed under § 216(b) all plaintiffs, including named plaintiffs 12 are required to file a consent to suit form with the court in which the action is 13 brought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).