Ketcher v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the duty to discuss a listing is triggered only if there is ample evidence in the record to support a finding that the listing is satisfied
• noting that the duty to discuss a Listing is “triggered” only if there is ample evidence in the record to support a finding that the Listing is satisfied
• explaining that an ALJ’s duty to compare symptoms to Listing criteria is “triggered if there is ample evidence in the record to support a determination that the claimant’s impairment meets or equals one of the listed impairments.”
• explaining that an ALJ’s duty to compare symptoms to Listing criteria is “triggered if there is ample evidence in the record to support a determination that the claimant’s impairment meets or equals one of the listed impairments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).