Skip to main content
· 3/26/1965

Kessinger v. State of Oklahoma

Citations

  • 239 F. Supp. 639
  • 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party “waive[s] all objections as to...document demands except those based on privilege” by failing to timely respond to document requests
  • holding that a party “waive[s] all objections as to...document demands except those based on privilege” by failing to timely respond to document requests
  • “[T]he court need not deem the requests to admit admitted. Pursuant to Rule 36(a)(3), that is the automatic result of a failure to timely respond.”
  • responses were due late 2011 and the motion was decided Feb. 2012

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bohanon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.