Kessel v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a somewhat similar statement \accurately describes how value is realized when options are actually exercised\
• stating that FASB Statement No. 123 recommends recognizing \options' grant-date value as part of compensation expense\ in financial statements but \does not purport to address the requirements for reporting proposed compensation in a proxy statement\
• stating, in the context of a challenge to a proxy statement, that “[d]isclosure of an item of information is not required . . . simply because it may be relevant or of interest to a reasonable investor”
• “For an omission to be actionable, the securities laws must impose a duty to disclose the omitted information.”
• “Disclosure of an item of information is not required . . . simply because it may be relevant or of interest to a reasonable investor.”
• “Disclosure of an item of information is not required, however, simply because it may be relevant or of interest to a reasonable investor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).