California Supreme Court· 7/13/1954
Kesler v. Pabst
Citations
- 43 Cal. 2d 254
- 273 P.2d 257
- 1954 Cal. LEXIS 245
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the mere existence of a family relationship did not establish agency in context of negligence claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-10-30· cited 143×
- Self v. SelfCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-11-09· cited 66×
- Shelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-03-08· cited 31×
- Tinker v. HobbsArizona Supreme Court· 1956-03-13· cited 15×
- Washington v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-10-30· cited 12×
- Cooke v. TsipouroglouCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-05-29· cited 10×
- Caldwell v. OdisioCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-07-02· cited 9×
- Bruton v. VilloriaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-01-24· cited 7×
- Casas v. Maulhardt Buick, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1968-02-07· cited 6×
- LaMonte v. De DiegoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-16· cited 5×
- Nemeth v. HairCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-11-30· cited 4×
- Mooren v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-07-07· cited 3×
- Ferguson v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-03-06· cited 2×
- Gen Ads, LLC v. BreitbartW.D. Washington· 2006-06-05· cited 2×
- Cook v. MehlbergCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-03-19· cited 2×
- Novo v. Hotel Del RioCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-05-04· cited 1×
- Bowslaugh v. BowslaughCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-08-07· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-01-25· cited 101×
- Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-03-07· cited 98×
- Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-10-09· cited 62×
- McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-01-13· cited 56×
- Soto v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-06-20· cited 35×
- Horandt v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1909-06-07· cited 10×
- Fink v. CampbellSixth Circuit· 1895-11-06· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.