Skip to main content
· 2/15/1926

Keshin v. E. J. Realty Co.

Citations

  • 216 A.D. 722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using the actions of the two parties, which disclosed their intent “with crystal clarity,” to interpret an otherwise undocumented oral contract
  • “That the actions of the parties 5 should be used as a reliable means of interpreting an ambiguous contract is, of course, well settled in 6 our law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.