Kescoli v. Babbitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that tribes “did not waive their immunity by intervening in ... administrative proceedings” because “[a]ny waiver must be unequivocal and may not be implied”
• recognizing that litigation may adversely affect nonparties without requiring their joinder but may not \destroy [their] legal entitlements\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• concluding that a challenge to a permit condition 4 was not moot because the relevant challenged condition had been reiterated in the new permit
• holding that tribes “did not waive their immunity by intervening in [an] administrative proceeding[]”
• determining case is not moot where condition governing operations remains in effect
• “[I]f the district court’s decision that an absent party’s interest would be impaired involves a legal determination, we review de novo that determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).