Kesaria v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that eyewitness identification of a defendant was sufficient to support a conviction despite contradicting alibi witnesses
• holding due process challenge was not preserved for review when that argument was not raised at trial
• holding evidence was sufficient to establish defendant’s identity to support burglary of habitation conviction where victims unequivocally identified defendant as man who burglarized home in part because they recognized his voice
• holding evidence was sufficient to establish defendant's identity to support burglary of habitation conviction where victims unequivocally identified defendant as man who burglarized home in part because they recognized his voice
• holding evidence was sufficient to establish defendant’s identity to support burglary of habitation conviction where victims unequivocally identified defendant as man who burglarized home in part because they recognized his voice
• holding evidence was sufficient to establish defendant’s identity to support burglary of habitation conviction where victims unequivocally identified defendant as man who burglarized home in part because they recognized his voice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).