K.E.S. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he Kurta Memo . . . make[s] clear that this liberal consideration applies not only to upgrades to the character of a discharge, but also to requests for changes to the narrative reason for separation on a veteran’s DD-214”
• “discern[ing] no error” in the Court of Federal Claims’ determination that because the “punitive dis- charge—Bad Conduct Discharge—was no longer reflected in his official record, AR 635-40, in effect at the time of his discharge, did not bar him from disability-retirement pro- cessing.”
• “discern[ing] no error” in the Court of Federal Claims’ determination that because the “punitive dis- charge—Bad Conduct Discharge—was no longer reflected in his official record, AR 635-40, in effect at the time of his discharge, did not bar him from disability-retirement pro- cessing.”
• “We begin our analysis, as we must, with the pertinent statutory language.”
• quot- ing Army Regulation 635-40 at ¶ 4-2
• quot- ing Army Regulation 635-40 at ¶ 4-2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).